Menu Expand

Reflexionen über Wiederholung

Oder: Welche Disziplin ist eigentlich zuständig für Kurt TucholskysPyrenäenbuch (1927)? 

Christians, Heiko

Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, Bd. 3 (2012), Iss. 2: S. 13–34

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Christians, Heiko

Abstract

Drawing upon the example of Tucholsky's 1927 [Book of the Pyrenees], the paper inquires into the possibilities of disciplinary competences and methodology-driven interpretations in the field of cultural studies. It asks whether in the case of the , the combination strategies of text and photography necessarily predetermine the interpretation, or whether there are other competitive horizons of interpretation beyond this wellestablished theoretical topos of media studies. If it is read in the context of Arnold Gehlen's 1927 [Reflections on habit] and Walter Benjamin's , Tucholsky's [Book/journal of voyages] presents itself as an contemporary reading of Kierkegaard and thus as a systematic discussion of medial usages and practices under the sign of repetition.