Menu Expand

Myths of Labor: Elements of an Economical Zoology 

Därmann, Iris

Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, Bd. 5 (2014), Iss. 1: S. 41–58

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Därmann, Iris

Cited By

  1. Vivant à la limite

    Lindberg, Susanna

    Les Études philosophiques, Bd. n° 76 (2006), Heft 1 S.107

    https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.061.0107 [Citations: 0]
  2. Religion, Animals, and Contemplation

    Komjathy, Louis

    Religions, Bd. 13 (2022), Heft 5 S.457

    https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050457 [Citations: 0]
  3. Building a better mouse trap: Item characteristics associated with rating discrepancies in 360-degree feedback.

    Kaiser, Robert B. | Craig, S. Bartholomew

    Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, Bd. 57 (2005), Heft 4 S.235

    https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.57.4.235 [Citations: 9]
  4. Human Enhancements and Voting: Towards a Declaration of Rights and Responsibilities of Beings

    Blodgett-Ford, S. J.

    Philosophies, Bd. 6 (2021), Heft 1 S.5

    https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6010005 [Citations: 1]

Abstract

Labor is both punishment and curse.At least this is what the mythical scenes of division and exclusion in Hesiod and in the Old Testament dramatise.At the same time they can be regarded as symptoms of misogyny.Without doubt, those two mythical scenes and the divine power to curse and sentence have held their spell over the economic tractates from antiquity to the modern period. How do the ancient writings of economic theory—and specifically Aristotle’s Politics and Ethics—regulate female Pleonexia on the one hand, and the limitless penal labor imposed on men on the other? How in turn do the economic tractates of the modern period—and here specifically John Locke’s famous essays on the economy of labor—respond to the problem of female hybris on the one hand and the characteristical burden and suffering associated with labor on the other? What role does the differentiation and separation between free and unfree, productive and reproductive labor and, not least, the economic marginalisation of reproductive labor, play in this? And finally: In what way do »King Bee« and Queen Bee, Nurse Bee and Drone appear in this context as figures of an at once mythical and economic zoology, whose emblematic efficacy extends up to Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees?

Inhaltsverzeichnis