ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Allochronie im Anthropozän: Ein Gespräch mit Erhard Schüttpelz
Schüttpelz, Erhard | Steglich, Sina | Ingwersen, Moritz
Kulturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift, Bd. 2022 (2022), Iss. 1: S. 107–122
3 Citations (CrossRef)
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Schüttpelz, Erhard
Steglich, Sina
Ingwersen, Moritz
Cited By
-
Anthropology in the Anthropocene
Anthropocene Anthropology—Contributions and Opportunities
Antweiler, Christoph
2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74591-1_5 [Citations: 0] -
Anthropology in the Anthropocene
Critique—Strengths and Weaknesses of Anthropocene Thinking
Antweiler, Christoph
2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74591-1_4 [Citations: 0] -
Dekolonialisierung und Diversifizierung des Wissens von der Antike: Zur Debatte um ‹Antike und Identität› in den Altertumswissenschaften
Immisch, Quintus | Schomber, SaskiaAntike und Abendland, Bd. 69 (2023), Heft 1 S.21
https://doi.org/10.1515/anab-2023-0002 [Citations: 1]
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the climate crisis and Anthropocene injustices, this conversation unfolds the concept of allochrony to examine modernity as a temporal regime that relied on the attribution of non-simultaneity to the populations of western colonies under the ethnographic gaze of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Positioning the racialized signifier of “the primitive” as a key concept and foil in understanding the articulation of modern subjectivity around 1900, modern temporalities are grounded in the construction of a temporal hierarchy that legitimized the dispossession of land and oppression of Indigenous peoples at the height of European imperialism. Drawing on cultural anthropology, media theory, and the history of science, this conversation provides a critical assessment of the Anthropocene by foregrounding the colonial violence and inherent paradoxes of modern epistemologies as a function of temporal categorization.
Powered by CloudPublish