Menu Expand

Der Philosophiebegriff im florentinischen Renaissanceplatonismus zwischen Pythagoreismus und Aristotelismus

Lemanski, Jens

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 58 (2017), Iss. 0: S. 27–66

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Lemanski, Jens

Cited By

  1. Unjustified Enrichment as a result of Turnover of Objects of Information Law

    Pavlov, A. A.

    Lex Russica, Bd. 77 (2024), Heft 5 S.60

    https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.210.5.060-072 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

Jens Lemanski: Der Philosophiebegriff im florentinischen Renaissanceplatonismus zwischen Pythagoreismus und Aristotelismus The paper examines the definitions of the concept ›philosophy‹ resp. ›the philosopher‹ in Florentine renaissance Platonism, namely Marsilio Ficino and his scholar Francesco di Zanobi Cattani da Diacceto. Following Socrates and Pythagoras, Ficino distinguishes between mundane philosophy and divine sapientia. In contrast to his teacher, Diacceto’s Aristotelism rejects the Pythagoreanism and connects philosophy with sapientia. In order to show how the differences between Ficino and Diacceto emerge, three more contemporaries are taken into consideration: Christoforo Landino, Angelo Poliziano and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. As a result of this examination, it can be said that the definition of ›philosophy‹ in Florentine renaissance Platonism tends either to Pythagoreism or to Aristotelism or to both. Closely connected with the debate on philosophy are topics and maxims such as meditatio mortis, theologia negativa, docta ignorantia, scio ne scio, nosce te ipsum, ne quid nimis et al.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Section Title Page Action Price
Jens Lemanski: Der Philosophiebegriff im florentinischen Renaissanceplatonismus zwischen Pythagoreismus und Aristotelismus\r 1