Menu Expand

As Platonic as Zarathustra: Nietzsche and Gustav Teichmüller

Foley, Adam

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 57 (2016), Iss. 0: S. 218–234

20 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Foley, Adam

Cited By

  1. Wh-Optatives in Danish: Compositional and Noncompositional Aspects

    Ørsnes, Bjarne

    Journal of Germanic Linguistics, Bd. 25 (2013), Heft 2 S.137

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542713000019 [Citations: 1]
  2. Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses

    MÜLLER, STEFAN

    Journal of Linguistics, Bd. 46 (2010), Heft 3 S.601

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990284 [Citations: 18]
  3. Sprachunterricht als Instruktion zur Inputverarbeitung

    Handwerker, Brigitte

    Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, Bd. 39 (2009), Heft 1 S.96

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379817 [Citations: 1]
  4. Valenzbindung oder Konstruktionsbindung? Eine Grundfrage der Grammatiktheorie

    Jacobs, Joachim

    ZFGL, Bd. 37 (2009), Heft 3 S.490

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.033 [Citations: 6]
  5. Handbuch Pragmatik

    Ellipsen

    Reich, Ingo

    2018

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_24 [Citations: 3]
  6. Konstruktionsvererbung, Valenzvererbung und die Reichweite von Konstruktionen

    Welke, Klaus

    ZFGL, Bd. 37 (2009), Heft 3 S.514

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.034 [Citations: 5]
  7. Rightward verb movement: A reappraisal

    Murphy, Andrew

    The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, Bd. 24 (2021), Heft 3 S.319

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-021-09130-8 [Citations: 0]
  8. Noch einmal: Partikelverbkonstruktionen

    Knobloch, Clemens

    ZFGL, Bd. 37 (2009), Heft 3 S.544

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.035 [Citations: 3]
  9. Deutsch im Fokus

    Lateinische Schulgrammatik oder andere Modelle?

    Dürscheid, Christa

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.57088/978-3-7329-8958-4_14 [Citations: 0]
  10. “ArgumenteHin, ArgumenteHer.” Regularity and Idiomaticity in GermanN Hin,N Her

    Finkbeiner, Rita

    Journal of Germanic Linguistics, Bd. 29 (2017), Heft 3 S.205

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542716000234 [Citations: 6]
  11. Linguistik im Sprachvergleich

    Moderne Syntaxtheorien

    Holler, Anke

    2022

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62806-5_11 [Citations: 1]
  12. Free Variation in Grammar

    Chapter 5. ‘Optional’ direct objects: Free variation?

    Symanczyk Joppe, Vilma

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.05sym [Citations: 0]
  13. Optative markers as communicative cues

    Grosz, Patrick Georg

    Natural Language Semantics, Bd. 22 (2014), Heft 1 S.89

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-013-9101-1 [Citations: 10]
  14. Constructing Families of Constructions

    Chapter 7. The family of German dative constructions

    De Knop, Sabine | Mollica, Fabio

    2017

    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.58.08dek [Citations: 1]
  15. Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konstruktionen ohne Grammatik?

    Welke, Klaus

    Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, Bd. 48 (2020), Heft 2 S.389

    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2020-2006 [Citations: 3]
  16. Expressions of motion events in German: an integrative constructionist approach for FLT1

    Knop, Sabine De

    CogniTextes, Bd. 20 (2020), Heft Volume 20

    https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.1882 [Citations: 3]
  17. On “R” in phrasal compounds – a contextualist approach

    Meibauer, Jörg

    STUF - Language Typology and Universals, Bd. 68 (2015), Heft 3 S.241

    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0013 [Citations: 4]
  18. Einladung und Einleitung

    Knobloch, Clemens

    ZFGL, Bd. 37 (2009), Heft 3 S.385

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.028 [Citations: 2]
  19. Constructional and Cognitive Explorations of Contrastive Linguistics

    The Integration of Frequency Dimensions and Lexicalisation Preferences in Contrastive Analysis

    De Knop, Sabine

    2024

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46602-1_6 [Citations: 0]
  20. Modal particles and sentence type restrictions: A construction grammar perspective

    Alm, Maria | Behr, Janina | Fischer, Kerstin

    Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, Bd. 3 (2018), Heft 1

    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.702 [Citations: 7]

Abstract

In a letter to Franz Overbeck from 1883 Nietzsche confessed that the more heread the German philosopher Gustav Teichmüller the more he realized »how poorly« he understood Plato and »how much Zarathustra Platonizes« (Πλατωνίζει). This is a striking admission from a thinker who defined his own philosophy as »inverted Platonism « and it has yet to be adequately explained. This article examines what Nietzsche may have meant by the verb »to Platonize« by drawing an explicitconnection to Teichmüller’s controversial views on Platonic psychology. Two possible meanings of the verb are put forth, a weak (rhetorical) and a strong (philosophical) meaning and a case in defense of the latter is made. In the strong sense of the word »to tonize« meant that the Overman was a mythos in the Platonic sense, in that it made Nietzsche’s much more recondite »Bundle Theory« of the self accessible to the average reader, but it did not correspond to a view of the self which Nietzsche espoused in his own voice.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Section Title Page Action Price
Adam Foley: As Platonic as Zarathustra: Nietzscheand Gustav Teichmüller 217