ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Éléments de sémantique historique du champ lexical de l’annotation
Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 55 (2014), Iss. 0: S. 20–39
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Pfersmann, Andréas
Cited By
-
Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition
Chapter 3. Acquisition of morpho-syntactic features in a bilingual Italian child
D’Aurizio, Laura | Stahnke, Johanna | Müller, Natascha2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.69.03dau [Citations: 0] -
Deutsch als schwächere Sprache bei deutsch-polnisch bilingualen Kindern:Studie zur Negation- und Verbstellung
Sopata, Aldona | Długosz, KamilZeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, Bd. 48 (2020), Heft 2 S.269
https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2020-2003 [Citations: 3]
Abstract
This article intends to investigate the etymology, the historical meanings and the semantic nuances of the terms used now or in the past, in the main languagesof Western Europe, to refer to marginal annotations of texts. The study shows that depending on the words under consideration, what stands out is either theirhermeneutic dimension (›gloss‹ and, to a lesser extent, ›scholion‹), their location on the page (›marginalia‹) or the time gap between their formulation and thatof the text (›apostil‹). Also, the focus may be on the material aspect of their production, especially when handwritten (›annotation‹).While ›notes‹, ›remarks‹and ›annotations‹ in their diversity may come from the writer himself, ›glosses‹ and ›scholia‹ are typically added by distinct authors, ancient scholars commenting in its margins a text that has become canonical.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Andréas Pfersmann: Éléments de sémantique historique du champlexical de l’annotation | 19 |