Menu Expand

Éléments de sémantique historique du champ lexical de l’annotation

Pfersmann, Andréas

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 55 (2014), Iss. 0: S. 20–39

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Pfersmann, Andréas

Cited By

  1. Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition

    Chapter 3. Acquisition of morpho-syntactic features in a bilingual Italian child

    D’Aurizio, Laura | Stahnke, Johanna | Müller, Natascha

    2024

    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.69.03dau [Citations: 0]
  2. Deutsch als schwächere Sprache bei deutsch-polnisch bilingualen Kindern:Studie zur Negation- und Verbstellung

    Sopata, Aldona | Długosz, Kamil

    Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, Bd. 48 (2020), Heft 2 S.269

    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2020-2003 [Citations: 3]

Abstract

This article intends to investigate the etymology, the historical meanings and the semantic nuances of the terms used now or in the past, in the main languagesof Western Europe, to refer to marginal annotations of texts. The study shows that depending on the words under consideration, what stands out is either theirhermeneutic dimension (›gloss‹ and, to a lesser extent, ›scholion‹), their location on the page (›marginalia‹) or the time gap between their formulation and thatof the text (›apostil‹). Also, the focus may be on the material aspect of their production, especially when handwritten (›annotation‹).While ›notes‹, ›remarks‹and ›annotations‹ in their diversity may come from the writer himself, ›glosses‹ and ›scholia‹ are typically added by distinct authors, ancient scholars commenting in its margins a text that has become canonical.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Section Title Page Action Price
Andréas Pfersmann: Éléments de sémantique historique du champlexical de l’annotation 19