Menu Expand

Aristotele’s usage of ›Principle of Motion‹ and the two Definitions of Nature in PHYSICS II,1

Fritsche, Johannes

Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 52 (2011), Iss. 0: S. 8–33

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Fritsche, Johannes

Cited By

  1. Der Ton macht den Sinn. Prosodische Differenzierungen bei syntaktischer Indifferenz als Lehrstoff

    Lang, Ewald

    Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, Bd. 40 (2010), Heft 2 S.172

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379839 [Citations: 0]
  2. ABSTRACTS (BY NUMBER)

    Tissue Engineering Part A, Bd. 28 (2022), Heft S1 S.S-1

    https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2022.29025.abstracts [Citations: 0]
  3. Anspielungstypen. Eine empirisch-linguistische Auseinandersetzung

    Błachut, Edyta

    Convivium. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Polen, Bd. (2016), Heft S.83

    https://doi.org/10.18778/2196-8403.2016.06 [Citations: 0]
  4. Wissensvermittlung in der Kinder- und Jugendliteratur der DDR

    Das SprachspielbuchDie dampfenden Hälse der Pferde im Turm von Babel(1978) von Franz Fühmann

    Meibauer, Jörg

    2017

    https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737006781.293 [Citations: 1]

Abstract

It has been discussed whether in his two defi nitions of nature in Physics II, Aristotle means a mover, a passive principle or both kinds of principles. I arguethat he means a mover. I discuss several occurrences of the expression archê kinêseôs (›principle of motion‹) in particular in Aristotle’s Metaphysics IX andPhysics (especially 255 b 29–31). Aristotle means most often a mover, sometimes»the time/site of the beginning of the motion« and never a passive principle.Finally, I briefl y discuss the status and function of the two defi nitions of nature within the context of Physics II and the entire Physics.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Section Title Page Action Price
Abhandlungen 7
Johannes Fritsche: Aristotele’s usage of [...] (›Principle of Motion‹) and the two Definitions of Nature in PHYSICS II, 1 7