ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Aristotele’s usage of ›Principle of Motion‹ and the two Definitions of Nature in PHYSICS II,1
Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 52 (2011), Iss. 0: S. 8–33
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Fritsche, Johannes
Cited By
-
ABSTRACTS (BY NUMBER)
Tissue Engineering Part A, Bd. 28 (2022), Heft S1 S.S-1
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2022.29025.abstracts [Citations: 0] -
Anspielungstypen. Eine empirisch-linguistische Auseinandersetzung
Błachut, Edyta
Convivium. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Polen, Bd. (2016), Heft S.83
https://doi.org/10.18778/2196-8403.2016.06 [Citations: 0]
Abstract
It has been discussed whether in his two defi nitions of nature in Physics II, Aristotle means a mover, a passive principle or both kinds of principles. I arguethat he means a mover. I discuss several occurrences of the expression archê kinêseôs (›principle of motion‹) in particular in Aristotle’s Metaphysics IX andPhysics (especially 255 b 29–31). Aristotle means most often a mover, sometimes»the time/site of the beginning of the motion« and never a passive principle.Finally, I briefl y discuss the status and function of the two defi nitions of nature within the context of Physics II and the entire Physics.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abhandlungen | 7 | ||
| Johannes Fritsche: Aristotele’s usage of [...] (›Principle of Motion‹) and the two Definitions of Nature in PHYSICS II, 1 | 7 |
Powered by CloudPublish