ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Widerlegung
Umrisse der Begriffsgeschichte
Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Bd. 46 (2004), Iss. 0: S. 10–29
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Knebel, Sven K.
Abstract
What do we mean, when we claim that something is »refuted«? The present essay deals with the evolution of the notion of refutation. Nowadays, refutations do not enjoy that high estimation in intellectual life as formerly – a lost of credit that is due to the removal of the Aristotelian pattern of refutation and its having been replaced by a more demanding pattern during the 16th – 18th centuries. On the one hand, the modern pattern pushed the Enlightenment culture, on the other hand, it ended up in a sceptical crisis. At first, this crisis concerned only philosophy. Finally, even the conclusiveness of empirical refutations was disputed. The philosophical way of doing Begriffsgeschichte, whereof the present essay is a specimen, centers on the long-term impact of definitions and distinctions. From this point of view, special attention is called to the contribution of the 18th-century Wolffianism.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Abhandlungen | 9 | ||
Sven K. Knebel: Widerlegung. Umrisse der Begriffsgeschichte | 9 |