ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Einstellungen zu kindlicher Sprachvariation
Eine empirische Pilotstudie zur Fremdbewertung regionalsprachlicher und/oder störungsbedingter Variation bei Kindern
Katerbow, Matthias | Eichele, Lena | Kauschke, Christina
Linguistische Berichte (LB), Bd. 2011 (2011), Iss. 228: S. 98–115
3 Citations (CrossRef)
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Katerbow, Matthias
Eichele, Lena
Kauschke, Christina
Cited By
-
Is Shame a Global Emotion?
Shield, Madeleine
Human Studies, Bd. 47 (2024), Heft 4 S.793
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09731-8 [Citations: 0] -
Intersubjectivity and interaction as crucial for understanding the moral role of shame: a critique of TOSCA-based shame research
Montes Sánchez, Alba
Frontiers in Psychology, Bd. 5 (2014), Heft
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00814 [Citations: 2] -
Domesticating Bodies: The Role of Shame in Obstetric Violence
Shabot, Sara Cohen | Korem, KeshetHypatia, Bd. 33 (2018), Heft 3 S.384
https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12428 [Citations: 51]
Abstract
Language acquisition has mostly been studied in terms of homogeneity instead of heterogeneity such as regional variation. On the other hand, developmental language disorders have been described in more detail. In this paper, we explore a combination of both types of variation – regional/social and developmental language disorders. We investigate the attitudes of adults toward children's regional variation and/or variation due to specific language impairment. The main findings are that language disorder is judged most negative with respect to achievement, social skills and parental education, while regional variation is judged much more positive. However, children with both regional variation and language impairment were judged less negative. The results suggest that regional variation may conceal language impairment for some degree.
Powered by CloudPublish