ZEITSCHRIFTENARTIKEL
Zur Semantik von Konzessivsätzen mit obwohl
Anto, Mailin | Steinbach, Markus
Linguistische Berichte (LB), Bd. 2013 (2013), Iss. 236: S. 43–69
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Zusätzliche Informationen
Bibliografische Daten
Anto, Mailin
Steinbach, Markus
Cited By
-
Aristotelian Subjectivism: Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception
External Senses I
Heider, Daniel
2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67341-3_3 [Citations: 0] -
Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism
Activity, Judgment, and Recognition in Nicole Oresme’s Philosophy of Perception
Silva, José Filipe
2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56946-4_14 [Citations: 0]
Abstract
Typically, the semantics of concessive conjunctions such as obwohl in German or although in English has been described by taking recourse to conditionality. König (1991b), for example, claims that obwohl has two meaning parts: (i) It has the truth-conditional meaning of the logical conjunction ∧ and (ii) it expresses the concessive presupposition p → ¬q. In this paper, we argue that the underlying conditional semantics of obwohl has to be analyzed as a tripartite quantified structure with an implicit modal in the sense of Kratzer (1978, 1991, 2012). This analysis has the advantage that the two meaning components of obwohl do not enter in a logical contradiction as in the traditional analysis. Furthermore, the specific semantic and pragmatic properties of German spoken variants of concessive clauses (i.e. obwohl-clauses with V2-order and disintegrated obwohl-clauses with verb-final order) can be derived without further assumptions within the quantificational analysis proposed in this paper.