Menu Expand

Zur Semantik von Konzessivsätzen mit obwohl 

Anto, Mailin | Steinbach, Markus

Linguistische Berichte (LB), Bd. 2013 (2013), Iss. 236: S. 43–69

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Zusätzliche Informationen

Bibliografische Daten

Anto, Mailin

Steinbach, Markus

Cited By

  1. Aristotelian Subjectivism: Francisco Suárez’s Philosophy of Perception

    External Senses I

    Heider, Daniel

    2021

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67341-3_3 [Citations: 0]
  2. Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism

    Activity, Judgment, and Recognition in Nicole Oresme’s Philosophy of Perception

    Silva, José Filipe

    2020

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56946-4_14 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

Typically, the semantics of concessive conjunctions such as obwohl in German or although in English has been described by taking recourse to conditionality. König (1991b), for example, claims that obwohl has two meaning parts: (i) It has the truth-conditional meaning of the logical conjunction ∧ and (ii) it expresses the concessive presupposition p → ¬q. In this paper, we argue that the underlying conditional semantics of obwohl has to be analyzed as a tripartite quantified structure with an implicit modal in the sense of Kratzer (1978, 1991, 2012). This analysis has the advantage that the two meaning components of obwohl do not enter in a logical contradiction as in the traditional analysis. Furthermore, the specific semantic and pragmatic properties of German spoken variants of concessive clauses (i.e. obwohl-clauses with V2-order and disintegrated obwohl-clauses with verb-final order) can be derived without further assumptions within the quantificational analysis proposed in this paper.